Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
I am amazed that the Frenchman would have the chutzpah to so boldly and disingenuously state that he would cut taxes on the middle class. Straight out of the President Clinton act of phoniness. He (Clinton) stated in January 92 "I want to make it very clear that this middle-class tax cut, in my view, is central to any attempt we're going to make to have a short term economic strategy." Jan92 ad; "I've offered a comprehensive plan to get our economy moving again. It starts with a tax cut for the middle class." Mar92 stated; "We need to provide a tax credit of up to $800 per child to ease the burden on working families." Oct92 debate; "We want to give modest middle-class tax relief to restore some fairness, especially to middle-class people with families with incomes of under $60K per year."

When you filed your taxes the following April after the election of 92, I ask you to recall how much tax relief you got. Give up? I'll tell you. Zero. As President, he did give folks big, fat tax increases though. Now remember President Clinton's denials when confronted on the illusory words used in his campaign. It was pure demagoguery then, and it's demagoguery now.

These are the same Democrats that just months ago were trying to vilify President Bush for actually cutting taxes, for the third straight year I might add. Making claims that the tax cuts were ruining the economy, exploding the deficit, the sky is falling, etc.etc.etc. Mr. Kerry is an elitist that believes all power, rights, economic opportunities, and beneficence flow from an all controlling Central Authority to its *citizens*. Otherwise known as the proletariat in the Marxist circles that rule the Democrat party. He will raise taxes on everyone that has net tax liability to further grow (invest in) big Government precisely because it redistributes income from the producers to the non producers to both weaken the middle-class and further governmental dependency. They have to lie, because if they told the truth, and accurately offered their voting record as indicative of future actions, they would be forever toast and probably hasten the extinction of their party.

Please. The man said he wants to expand the military, modernize/upgrade their equipment. Yet he votes to do the opposite as Senator. You could go on and on with the misrepresentations. I did note the curved hand, half a%%ed shaky salute though. So much for snap to! I guess.

5,043 posted on 07/29/2004 9:28:58 PM PDT by Kudsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kudsman

Is it over? I mean is this the fireworks show that never ends? Beats listening to Kerry.


5,047 posted on 07/29/2004 9:30:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5043 | View Replies ]

To: Kudsman

Kerry will say he wants to spend money but then actuall vote against it or in the case of president VETO it and say we can't afford it.

He would have vetoed the 87 million and he would have vetoed all war on terror spending.

He would have launched a cruse missile.


5,048 posted on 07/29/2004 9:30:41 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5043 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson