To: dead
11. Now that we know that airport security is an imperfect line of defense and thankfully not the last line since we now have air marshals, hardened cockpit doors and a more attentive class of passengers, does it not make sense to arm pilots on every flight to increase the odds that security measures are never again breached? In other words, to take a concrete example: Is it more important to save 3,000 lives than to protect the life of a hijacker?
12. What are the recommendations by the Panel for better immigration controls, especially as it involves biometric identification, tracking and reporting?
13. Is the Al Gore brokered agreement with airlines not to single out more than two members of the same ethnic group now considered to be obsolete and should be abandoned?
14. What weight did the Panel accord pre-9/11 reports from Russian intelligence as recently disclosed by President Putin that Saddam was actively working to attack Americans?
15. What evidence threshold can be recommended in evaluating whether any particular group is responsible for an attack on a US facility or ship before taking effective action against that group or in accepting offers to extradite the group's leader?
322 posted on
07/22/2004 10:43:58 AM PDT by
OESY
To: OESY
Excellent questions, but not in line with the agenda of the press - finding ways to get John Kerry elected.
328 posted on
07/22/2004 10:54:36 AM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: OESY
13. Is the Al Gore brokered agreement with airlines not to single out more than two members of the same ethnic group now considered to be obsolete and should be abandoned?Is this actually a formal regulation (law) or just an urban legend?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson