If Kerry is/was on the national security committee, and, these documents show that the Clinton Admin AND Kerry had advance warning of the attacks and did nothing... then BOTH Kerry and Clinton go down in flames.
Wash post reporter was just on MSNBC , saying bloggers are spreading this "pants or socks" story. For crying out loud, it was in the AP story, of course we're talking about it. But she's acting like it's not true, something out of thin air in a 'partisan environment'.
This omission is more than just protecting/creating spin; it would be treasonous in my book.
And yes, Kerry could/should be damaged for wherever he may fit in this puzzle; particularly if he was so apprised when Berger came to him as an employee to his campaign.
If he did not know. . .and I suspect he did. . .then he would want Bergers head on a platter.
Interesting to see; how Kerry responds to 'Berger's Sox'.