If the motive was to give ex-Clinton oficials a little better "spin" before the 9-11 Commission, I don't think this story will go very far; such a motive would only be played up by the press if the Bush administration did it. Then it would be big news. But if Berger were found to be acting on behalf of the Kerry campaign, I think it might be a different story. Then the press might go after it.
Info on Fox says Berger did this more than once! Twice apparently; and only after second time; did they notify FBI (first time; they called Lindsey).
In addition to millenium terror reportinfo; Berger also retrieved shipping port/ship 'security' issue papers.
Coincidentally, Kerry used such info in a major campaign speech - as to what needed to be done to secure shipping port security - almost immediately following the security papers disappearing into Bergers pants et al. . .
They are all offering ' not serious as there were copies; so what (?) - but where are they and 'who knew'. . .locked away with high security; far from public access. . .sooooo.
So why does that explanation imply absolution for Berger?
Berger needed the papers; the info; and he got them; it might appear that they helped save someone; and as well, may have inspired someone else.
Interesting if Berger was first 'serving' Clinton; and then unbeknownst to Clinton; serving Kerry as well.