To: newfarm4000n
I don't understand why you're so adamant about pointing out the obvious. To the point where you have to scream in capital letters. Yes, we all know that boycotts aren't done to save money. Obvious. Tautological. Unimportant to the point of being irrelevant.
Your loud insistence in emphasizing this utterly uninteresting tautology makes me wonder if you don't have another agenda. Perhaps what you're really doing is trying to talk us out of boycotting France. Is that true?
Are you a closet Francophile?
(I know the question will make you angry, but nothing else I can think of explains your obsession with explaining that which needs no explanation. Yes. We get it. You don't make money holding boycotts. Got it.)
82 posted on
07/22/2004 5:38:58 PM PDT by
samtheman
(www.georgewbush.com)
To: samtheman
Are you a closet Francophile? I dislike France as much as the next person. I just received so many responses to what i thought was a merely obvious statement . If what i said was a tautology then why so many negative responses to my post ? I mean why even bother responding to a "meaningless statement ".
Just because i oppose a certain measure as being impractical doesn't mean i sympathize with the enemy.It's like saying because you oppose a Federal Homeland Security bureaucracy then you must be pro-terrorist . I really do hope that the Islamic Republic of France gets destroyed I just think that boycotts harm us more than them.
You are just irritated that your B-grade economic analysis is clearly indefensible and are trying to back flip your way out of it.
83 posted on
07/22/2004 7:08:14 PM PDT by
newfarm4000n
(Taxes for social security is theft)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson