Posted on 07/18/2004 12:16:52 PM PDT by Copernicus
If she stood her ground and refused to pay the fine, the nice police officer would handcuff her and put her in jail. Is that when it becomes a police state?
Excellent!
Since your source is not attributed I presume you can provide the statistics on aortal tears since 1990 in the decade when many secondary seatbelt laws were converted to primary seatbelt laws and also document the sudden increase in thoraxic aortal tears since these laws were passed and enforced.
Best regards,
Here ya go - ya heliocentric hooligan! ;-)
I am unfamilar with concept of a "volunteer parking enforcement brigade" or their authority to issue any form of ticket or their jurisdiction on private property.
Should someone block or approach me in the fashion you described they would very quickly be distracted by the sight of a .357 in my hand.
They would also likely find themselves on the wrong end of a civil suit for illegal detention or possibly even criminal charges of kidnapping.
Best regards,
I had the asame happen, only the cop was standing at my window when I took off the seatbelt. When he asked my for my license, I took it off. Two minutes later he is threatening a ticket for no seat belt.
Unfortunately, in spite of the internal evidence they present, the authors distance themselves from the connection between seatbelt and injury. Such is the power of the political environment to shape public dialogue.
Autopsy review studies have shown that between 12 and 29% of all traffic fatalities have thoracic aortic trauma. 15 Thoracic aortic tear carries a mortality rate of over 90%, with on-scene death occurring in more than 80% of individuals sustaining this injury. 1,3 Because of improved prehospital response, treatment, and triage measures, an increasing number of individuals with this injury are being seen in the emergency department. Rapid diagnosis of thoracic aortic tear continues to be a challenge to clinicians, particularly in the typical case of a motor vehicle crash victim presenting with multiple injuries. Unfortunately, the lack of meaningful information on the mechanism required to induce thoracic aortic injury leads to excessive screening of patients with a variety of expensive and time-consuming tests.
Best regards,
No, the excerpt is from later in the article.
These are two different women, one wearing it under her arm, one wearing it "too loosely".
I wonder how many people were victims of a crime while these women were being harassed??
I suspect that this reaction to the changes around us is one of God's way of getting us ready to shift off this mortal coil. When we're young and everything is going our way it seems pretty important to us to continue with the status quo, but at this stage the thought of moving on is no where nearly as upsetting!
"I've been wearing seatbelts religiously since I was 15-1/2 (driver's ed films made a believer out of me).""
I wished they still showed those to kids as part of Driving School.
The body parts and smoking skulls had a way of making you think about being safe.
Hey I won't ping you. But don't expect to make some loony statement, of course with no reference to back up said statement (and with no mention of injuries caused by seat belts), and wrap it up with 'if you want to die, so be it' and not expect me to respond. You want to go on believing your myths, I could care less.
Thank you! I am only 5' and the seat belt does cut across my throat. And, while I may not be Dolly Parton, I am certainly not Twiggy so the chest area can get uncomfortable, as well.
As an aside, I was in a multiple car accident when I was about 20 in California. I was not wearing a seat belt. I ended up on the floor. Even the policeman said it was a good thing. I would have been quite hurt. As it was, I scraped my knee and got yelled at for being late for work!
I do wear my belt all the time. Wisconsin has the Click It or Ticket too.I am not wearing it such that it cuts across my throat and chin, though.
If the D or V ring the belt runs through is mounted or fastened in a visable vertical "slot" it is adjustable. If it is, the fastener, which may not be visable is a pan head "allen" type screw. Be prepared with a long "allen" wrench, because it is torqued to about 85 ft/lb, and requires a fair amount of strength to loosen without a torque wrench with an allen type adapter. Most cars after 1995 are adjustable. An '89 Buick might not be.
aye carumba ... what's really scary is that he might not have been observant enough to see you take it off ... OTOH, he could just be a jerk ... man
they had people splattered on the freeway ... a face of a guy who hit a bridge (eyes still open) ... and sound/film of a guy picked up who broke his back, thrown out of a convertible when he clipped a semi cutting in from passing too fast ... and a guy stuffed in the left rear wheelwell after his car rolled, he was not wearing a seatbelt, and it stuffed him between the left rear tire and the wheelwell ...
I can still see those images from 1975 Driver's Ed ... oh yeah, they put some serious fear in me ...
I'll take a look at her car sometime this week ... thanks for the info ...
i work at a hotel in livermore ca. a guy checks in,drives to his room. no seat belt, $95.00 ticket in our parking lot he was a little pissed.
I dont like jerk cops.
how can there be a ticket on private property? ... it's not the street ... this seems "out of bounds" ... dunno ... California thing or is this all over I wonder?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.