I'm catching a hint of sarcasm here, wardaddy. Sincere question: Do you think this scenario (man wants babies, woman wants no part of them) is the usual one? While I don't suppose there's any way of knowing for sure, I have known a number of women who have had abortions, and not one of them had it against the will of the father. I know it happens, but I tend to believe the more typical scenario is that a) neither want the baby, or b) he doesn't, and she doesn't want to do it alone.
I could be wrong, but that's what I've seen.
If you know something I don't know, please enlighten me. (I'd say "hit me", but I know you're a cro-mag and you'd probably take me literally. ; )
You're talking to one actually from a long time ago and I know plenty others.
Of course there are men who a) don't care anyway or b) do want the woman to "get rid of it" but that was not what I was adressing nor was that the gist of this article. In this article the man is the only one described as maybe not wanting this and is told to leave.
Now I'm not pointing out this to you specifically but as you know I am indeed very old school and do hold opinions that indeed do have exceptions and I do sometimes generalize but I can remember when it was okay to do that without having to equivocate every alternative example.
I don't beat up chicks as a rule but the worst fight i ever saw was in 12th grade between two huge black chicks who tore each other's clothes off and stabbed one another with pencils.
I think abortion is killing and in the end unless a man is holding a gun to the woman's head.....she and the abortionist are doing the killing. So much for kinder and gentler.....nearly 40 million dead babies later and not one ever aborted by a pregnant man.
just calling a spade a spade...can I say that?
lots of folks are to blame for infanticide but in the end it's mom's "choice" almost always.