Sorry, thought you knew I was referring to your 183, that he signed off or even knew about the article before it was published. Since you're relatively new (welcome, welcome), look at the linkback number to see what a person is responding to (sorry if this sounds naggy).
I think I have good reason to doubt that she cares what he thinks about publishing an article when he allowed himself to acquiesce in the killing of 2 of his 3 children without too much of a fight.
Now it's my turn to guess that you are assuming incorrectly that he did not have to give his permission to have this article published. I can't fathom that. These pro-choice people are always talking about privacy, and for this to be published in the Gray Lady, of all places, for a worldwide audience, I'm sure she and the Times made very sure it was okay with Peter.