To: dennisw
It's sad that the woman was in that fix, and she faced a difficult decision. But if she was that ill-prepared and unsuited to raise more than one child, she could have placed the other two babies up for adoption. There are a number of married couples unable to have children who want them. Was she so clueless that than termination was the only option that occured to her?
To: Clintonfatigued
she could have placed the other two babies up for adoption. There are a number of married couples unable to have children who want them. Was she so clueless that than termination was the only option that occurred to her?Would have conflicted with her free lance career and her walk up apartment.
23 posted on
07/18/2004 12:05:45 PM PDT by
dennisw
(Once is Happenstance. Twice is Coincidence. The third time is Enemy action. - Ian Fleming)
To: Clintonfatigued
Was she so clueless that than termination was the only option that occured to her?Unfortunately, my good-hearted friend, this woman didn't want to be inconvenienced by the bed rest during a pregnancy that would keep her from "having a life".
28 posted on
07/18/2004 12:07:50 PM PDT by
GVnana
(Tagline? I don't need no stinkin' tagline!)
To: Clintonfatigued
She was too upset about not being able to fly with triplets in utero.
256 posted on
07/18/2004 6:06:23 PM PDT by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: Clintonfatigued
Right you are, but that would have "put her out" to seek loving, caring childless couples to adopt them. I've got news for that selfish, murdering dame.........ONE child to raise is a hand full.......and she'll soon see that. Wouldn't be suprised if she then seeks someone to adopt him. (Hope she goes sterile).:(
405 posted on
07/19/2004 11:09:29 AM PDT by
Dawgreg
(Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson