Also note, the Constitution sets up age limits for a very specific FEW things. Like holding FEDERAL office. Strictly deliniated and specificly for a purpose.
Don't be obtuse. You may have glanced at the Constitution once, but you don't seem to have retained much of what it said.
"You may have glanced at the Constitution once, but you don't seem to have retained much of what it said."
You mean your interpretation of it...
Libertianism is a philosophy... you are forcing that philosophy through the courts... and that my friend is wrong.
You can't read the Constitution and say... "Freedom of speech"... you must figure out what the founders meant by that freedom... and interpret the Constitution that way...
If you don't like that... you must use the legislative branch to change it... not the courts.