Oh my. Please don't misinterpret an explanation of a ruling as my support of that ruling. Why would you do that?
"As far as that interpretation not mattering when it comes to the law, I disagree."
Well, what I meant was that his interpretation doesn't matter -- if the USSC, or any court, had that interpretation, it would matter.
Why? Because your comments seem supportive of - or at least sympathetic towards - the "collective right" interpretation, that's why. If I misread that, I apologize.