[inquest]

The clear words of our Constitution are irrefutable, inquest. -- Which always leaves the question; -- why do you try?

Since you're the one who's imagining that I'm refuting the Constitution itself, rather than your own clueless reading of it, you should also be able to imagine the answer to the question "why".

I'll be happy to answer a substantive point you have. Otherwise, I'll leave you to your pointless blabbing.

[tpaine]

The clear words of our Constitution are irrefutable, inquest. -- Which always leaves the question; -- why do you try?

Since you're the one who's imagining that I'm refuting the Constitution itself, ---

I imagined you wrote this?

"There's been quite a lot of misunderstanding as to the supremacy clause. It has no effect on the applicability of any of the other provisions of the Constitution.
-inquest-

Why do you claim that Art. VI, Sec. 2 does not apply to any of the other provisions of the Constitution?