[robertpaulsen]

So Justice Thomas says that Congress cannot force the state to fund (administer and enforce) federal regulations. Why, that's mighty big of him.

Of course, I'm sure he sees no problem with the USSC and other courts forcing states to fund judicial activism. That's OK.

The utter hypocrisy of this man is unbelievable.

[Ken H]

So Justice Thomas says that Congress cannot force the state to fund (administer and enforce) federal regulations. Why, that's mighty big of him.

Why, I thought a big supporter of States Rights and Limited Government would be pleased with Justice Clarence Thomas over this.

Of course, I'm sure he sees no problem with the USSC and other courts forcing states to fund judicial activism. That's OK.

Do you have an example of Justice Thomas' approval of forcing States to fund judicial activism? If you do, fine. If not, then you have just set up and knocked down a strawman.

The utter hypocrisy of this man is unbelievable.

Failure to provide an example will have a substantial effect on the validity of your characterization of Justice Thomas.