Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: asmith92008
"So then would homosexual activity be permitted to be outlawed on public property. I'm not talking about sexual activity but simply kissing or holding hands."

Either outlaw kissing and holding hands or don't, but it must apply equally to all, since public property is owned by all. If a bunch of homos were routinely making a spectacle, I would vote to ban it.

"It has to do with the fact that I have found most libertarians to oppose moral regulations until you find something they don't like. Dog kicking is usually what gets them."

So it has nothing to do with this thread? If not, we have FReepmail and the ability to start new threads.

152 posted on 07/17/2004 4:26:40 PM PDT by Voice in your head ("The secret of Happiness is Freedom, and the secret of Freedom, Courage." - Thucydides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Voice in your head
So the public is not permitted to decide which kinds of displays of affection it finds immoral or distasteful enough to ban on public property?
153 posted on 07/17/2004 4:35:31 PM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson