Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Isn't it amazing how the liberals took over the denominations
4religious-right.info ^ | November 2, 2002 | Kevin Jones

Posted on 07/16/2004 7:05:35 AM PDT by Kerberos

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last
To: Kerberos
"Yeah but you see the problem is your party use to be my party until"

So stay where you are. I'm quite happy with my party as it is.

121 posted on 07/19/2004 5:52:09 AM PDT by MEGoody (Kerry - isn't that a girl's name? (Conan O'Brian))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

"So stay where you are. I'm quite happy with my party as it is."

I'm not nor am I one that is accustom to rolling over. So get use to hearing from me.


122 posted on 07/19/2004 6:30:35 AM PDT by Kerberos (Convictions are more dangerous enemies of the truth than lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos

I think this is a good idea.

I think that political conservatives should use it also in regaining total control of the Republican Party.


123 posted on 07/19/2004 7:26:21 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
"I'm not nor am I one that is accustom to rolling over."

Neither are the ones you want to call extremists. This should be an interesting ride.

124 posted on 07/19/2004 7:29:57 AM PDT by MEGoody (Kerry - isn't that a girl's name? (Conan O'Brian))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
"I'm not nor am I one that is accustom to rolling over."

Neither are the ones you want to call extremists. This should be an interesting ride.

125 posted on 07/19/2004 7:30:16 AM PDT by MEGoody (Kerry - isn't that a girl's name? (Conan O'Brian))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
"I think that political conservatives should use it also in regaining gaining total control of the Republican Party."

Oh they are sure giving it their best shot!

126 posted on 07/19/2004 7:30:43 AM PDT by Kerberos (Convictions are more dangerous enemies of the truth than lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: antidisestablishment
No, you can understand that I will not let law be incongruent with morality. You argue for a law divorced from morality. That is impossible, except you have immoral laws.

What is your opinion of the morality of the Violence Against Women Act?

127 posted on 07/19/2004 7:39:18 AM PDT by tacticalogic ( Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of the truth than lies"

Spoken like the quintessential relativist.

Before registering to post here, and in order to gain credibility for your opinions among those capable of critical thought, those who suffer from cognitive dissonance should go into therapy to see how stupid it is for them to hold polar opposite beliefs simultaneously.

For instance:

Do you believe that it is *the truth* that your rights are unalienable (given to you by God and not men)?

Are you SURE that that is *the truth*?

If so, do you realize that THAT IS A *CONVICTION* about a *truth*.

Please explain how being convicted by that truth is *at the same time* (simultaneously) a more dangerous enemy to that truth than a lie.

What is a confused dude like you doing on a forum which is dedicated to upholding the Constitution of the United States, when that Constitution was only put into place by its Framers to protect, what their convictions told them, are our unalienable rights?

If it ISN'T an ABSOLUTE TRUTH that our rights are given to us by God, and therefore, by definition, CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY FROM US BY MERE MEN --- then there is no purpose to having that Constitution in place. It is a meaningless document unless its purpose is to protect an absolute truth.

128 posted on 07/19/2004 8:25:18 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (All DemocRATS are either relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
"Before registering to post here, and in order to gain credibility for your opinions among those capable of critical thought'

ROTFLMAO.............Sorry but I read your profile page.

129 posted on 07/19/2004 8:49:16 AM PDT by Kerberos (Convictions are more dangerous enemies of the truth than lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos; oldglory; MinuteGal; Luke FReeman; gonzo; JulieRNR21; sheikdetailfeather; Mustang; ...

M-PI wrote: "....Before registering to post here, and in order to gain credibility for your opinions among those capable of critical thought..."

Kerberos: "ROTFLMAO.............[I cut out the stuff you wrote in #128 that I couldn't answer, and instead hope to divert everyone's attention away from me on to you by writing this] "Sorry but I read your profile page [where I found this sort of stupid stuff]":

Jim Robinson wrote:

You should always vote your principles.

Here are some of the Democrat Party's principles:

They say abortion is a constitutional right.

They say the second amendment does not apply to individuals.

They say that homosexual marriage is a constitutional right.

They say that government provided healthcare is a constitutional right.

They say that the Constitution should be subserviant to the United Nations.

They say that we must subject ourselves to the environmental nazi agencies (world-wide).

They say that the Constitution can be amended by the Courts.

They say that admittance to universities should be based on race.

They say that homosexualism (and many other perversions that may be repugnant to you and me) must be normalized and taught to our youngsters in government controlled schools, yet God cannot even be mentioned.

They say that the federal government should control and fund all matters relating to health, education, welfare and the environment.

They say that we should not defend our nation when attacked. Etc, etc, etc.

As long as your principles allow people with the above [principles] to completely control every aspect of your life, then you should have no problem allowing the Democrats to retake control.

234 posted on 07/11/2003 1:03 AM EDT by Jim Robinson


130 posted on 07/19/2004 9:17:21 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (All DemocRATS are either relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Wow, sounds like Jim should get over here and join the debate.


131 posted on 07/19/2004 9:31:18 AM PDT by Kerberos (Convictions are more dangerous enemies of the truth than lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

"Neither are the ones you want to call extremists. This should be an interesting ride."

Well isn't that the point, to exchange views and have fun.


132 posted on 07/19/2004 10:00:26 AM PDT by Kerberos (Convictions are more dangerous enemies of the truth than lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson