[GVnana]

he receives the child into his home and openly holds out the child as his natural child.”
How did the court apply this to a woman? By ruling that the statute must be read in a “gender-neutral manner.” As the court acknowledged, the legislature never “expressly” contemplated such a result, but it said that it’s what “gender-neutrality” requires.

The ruling lays bare the heart of homosexual advocacy. The denial of linkage between sex and procreation, and the objectification of children.

[Siamese Princess]

The ruling lays bare the heart of homosexual advocacy. The denial of linkage between sex and procreation, and the objectification of children.

Right, and also the rejection of any kind of common-sense sex role or gender distinctions: a female "father."