Skip to comments.
The World On Its Head: The Strange Case of Kristine H. and Lisa R.
BreakPoint with Charles Colson ^
| 12 July 04
| Mark Earley
Posted on 07/12/2004 4:23:39 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: Mr. Silverback
In a strange sort of way; they are saying that Lisa cannot be the mother; even though she is a woman. And she is obviously not a father; so how can they say she is which is illogical at the very least?
To: freekitty
In a way they are talking traditional marriage; because it seems they are saying a child can't have two mothers(two dads). Kind of burst the balloon in their theory of two gays raising a child as two parents. I call it stupid logic.
To: Mr. Silverback
Old men who wear dresses to work are capable of ruling poorly on anything,anytime, and anywere--and generally do so.
To: familyop
Susan B. Anthony is not the problem with our society today. She did many good things to help women out of a situation that needed fixing, much as early abolitionists and Civil Rights activists did. The problem is modern day feminism that was birthed in the 1960s and 1970s forward.
24
posted on
07/14/2004 1:19:53 PM PDT
by
gal522
To: gal522
25
posted on
07/14/2004 1:50:18 PM PDT
by
familyop
(Essayons)
To: gal522
Here's another interesting one for you, and it's backed up by very good evidence. Follow the following link, then follow the "no-fault divorce" link in the page that comes up. You'll see a document that was authored by Elizabeth Cady Stanton.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and their friends also pushed for no-fault divorce.
That effort by even the early feminists was continued until there were more of their adulterous/sexually confused kind in the 1970s, and no-fault divorce laws passed. Now our elite in both parties are trying to keep no-fault divorce laws and the huge bureaucracy supporting it (VAWA, Child Support Act, social services, "affirmative action," various "women's" offices, etc.) intact to force all of us to support their indulgences.
26
posted on
07/14/2004 2:52:57 PM PDT
by
familyop
(Essayons)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson