To: tdadams
With those Pell grant dollars, she'll use a little bit of taxpayer money now, but in the long run, she'll be a net contributor rather than a net user. So you really don't have a problem with confiscating money from hardworking citizens to hand it out to those unwilling to come up with their own money to better themselves.
Tell you what, if you would send me $20,000 I will use it to go to graduate school. Once I graduate I'm sure I can make more money, which I will use to pay you back with interest.
Deal?
How about instead, I forcibly take your money from you via taxation and use it for the same purpose. Aren't you better off?
To: mastequilla
How about instead, I forcibly take your money from you via taxation and use it for the same purpose. Aren't you better off? Is THIS the tone you would like to have seen Rush take with this caller? Congratulations, you've just created a new Kerry voter!
54 posted on
07/12/2004 9:18:28 AM PDT by
Warren_Piece
(Just thinkin' about women and glasses of beer.)
To: mastequilla
I know you're being sarcastic, but you know what? I would pitch in to help if you could get accepted to business school. Not the whole deal, but a little.
But I really doubt I'd have to worry about you getting into business school since you can't do basic cost-benefit analysis.
56 posted on
07/12/2004 9:20:34 AM PDT by
tdadams
(If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson