Not all, but many of them. I don't see any particular moral imperative in dictating wheather I should drive on the right side of the road, or the left.
At any rate, there seems to be a degree of disingenuouness in the argument that evangelical SC's only want to advance their agenda by persuasion and not compulsion, while demanding more opportunity to try and pesuade those with the poewer to compel.
Evangelicals do not advocate mandatory Sabbath worship, state support of the church, or even test oaths to hold public office. Some would want to wrest the public schools from its present control by secular humanists, and bring back public prayer and Bible reading. This is, of course, an attempt to compel people to outwardly conform with Judeo-Christian standards of behavior. However, most players in he public education arena do likewise for their causes, e.g., sex educators who promote premarital sex, liberals who try to promote multiculturalism and political correctness, minority advocates who favor public recognition of and honor to their particular race, nationality, religion, and sexual orientation. Too few people advocate the separation of school and state, which is the most reasonable solution to this matter.
If some social conservatives are disingenuous in this respect, so are the RINOs and liberals who promote sexual license, multiculturalism, and PC in the name of freedom and tolerance.