[Dimensio]

What did I tell you? It doesn't count because you didn't involve 'pimples'. See, creationists redefine evolution to something totally contrary to reality, then declare victory when you can't 'prove' their completely bogus definition.

An utterly dishonest tactic, but what can you expect from them?

[PatrickHenry]

Totally honest placemarker. 100?

[orionblamblam]

> An utterly dishonest tactic, but what can you expect from them?

Desperation. If an evolutionist, or a scientist of *any* stripe, finds an indisputable error in a theory or data record, they can adjust accordingly to fit the new data, or scrap the theory and try something else. Heck, there's nothign scientists love more than a serious and *real* flaw... gives 'em somethign new to explore.

If a Creationist finds an indisputable flaw in their notions... then that means that the whole nature of the universe, God, life, death and morality come crashing down on them.

You can thus understand why they might be a tad twitchy...