But the PC crowd take that question as comparing homosexual behavior to bestiality; i.e. they are both perverted. And, to be fair, some actually do mean it that way. I do not happen to agree with that harsher view, though I don't call those who espouse it "homophobes". I believe there is such a thing as moral, responsible, non-perveted homosexual sex between two consenting non-acting-out adults.
Such as, for example, me.
Homosexual activity is inherently disordered. Warped. Twisted. Wicked. Depraved. Perverted. Rotten to the core.
You said:
"I believe there is such a thing as moral, responsible, non-perveted homosexual sex between two consenting non-acting-out adults."
This is only true if there is no sex act involved. Sex between two men or two women is by is very physical nature unnatural, unhealthy, and immoral. If you are not sure of this, read up about same sex acts and how they cause disease and physical ailments.
What to speak of screwing up the chi and prana.
Homosexuality can never be "non-perverted." Sex has a biological purpose. Any sexual acting out other than heterosexual acting out by adults is contrary to that purpose and therefore, by definition, "perverted."