You are not making sense.
Nothing in this report is new news. We had David Kay in January and Congress wrining hands over 'faulty intel' etc. ... and that was before we found sarin gas in EIDs, more shells wit cyclosarin, etc. We already have had Howard Dean, Moore, and other fanatics saying "Bush lied" for a year now. (They are the ones lying, but that is another matter.) If incorrect pre-war intel is laid at CIA, it doesnt help the Pres. but wont hurt him more than he has already been, since this NEWS IS ALREADY BEEN OUT THERE.
This is just Senate CYA blaming others for a general (and understandable) gap in knowledge about Saddam's secret programs.
What this is NOT is any more proof of "No WMD" thesis.
The "No WMD" thesis gets more disproven with each (non-media-covered) discovery of banned weapons.
whew. I am just a housewife. I really thought that's what I was picking up from the whole thing. I feel a little better. PLUS, the misleading thread title correction is calming me down... some.
Yes, you get it and I get it but the Bush haters in the general populace will latch on to this Senate Intelligence Committee report (the headlines, mind you) with the fervor of a rabid dog to validate their beliefs. This could very well sway the swing voters to Kerry.