Not only would I disagree with the quotes listed, and the men who are quoted, but furthermore, I wonder how accurately the quotes reflect the speakers' actual sentiments.
And I'm surprised to find posted on FR stuff sourced from the Institute for Historical Review or the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust, the two preeminent nests of Holocaust denial on the internet. The IHR and CODOH people are scum-of-the-earth types not worthy of legitimate recognition.
A poor choice of words makes my clause very muddy. I'll try again:
...what aspect of those quotes might have been twisted by the way in which they were quoted?