Bush's negatives suggest that the´middle of the electorate, the part that decides elections, has decided to fire Bush. That means they will check Kerry out, mostly in the debates, to see if it is safe to hire him.
Only if it is not safe to hire Kerry will they revert to Bush.
Kerry need not beat Bush in the debates, he merely must avoid career ending gaffes. He merely has to appear Presidential. Boring is good. "Wrong" on the issues doesn't matter. Charisma is nice but optional. All Kerry has to do is not look like a fool in the eyes of a politically illiterate undecided.
Our best hope is the ground game and to energize the base.
Why don't you pipe down?
I've read a lot of your old posts; you're almost always wrong.
Go crawl back to DU please.
Bush's personal negatives are in the 20's and his positives in the 60's.
The economy is strong and will stay that way. The country of Iraq is sovereign and free because we liberated it.
And Kerry and Edwards are losers.
Be happy.