Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snopercod
I'm a RINO because I still believe in limited government, and the republican party clearly doesn't any more.

Then may I assume that you will make the only moral choice and vote for Michael Badnarik for President?

Surely Bush is not a small government president and Kerry is the biggest govt guy around. There is no lesser evil here among the big 2.

It is just too dangerous to let another 4 years go by with a big government president, even if the congress is of the opposite party. A true small govt person MUST win this time. We cannot allow the freedom loving vote to be split up among 2 or 3 candidates. Every freedom lover should overlook the small differences and vote for the candidate with the best ballot access position, the Libertarian.

6 posted on 07/04/2004 8:42:12 AM PDT by Mike4Freedom (Freedom is the one thing that you cannot have unless you grant it to everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Mike4Freedom

As a conservative libertarian, I would like to believe that Badnarik is an option. I voted for Marrou in '92, Browne in '96 and 2000. The fact is that 80% of Americans will not have even HEARD of Badnarik by November 2. And even if there were awareness of his candidacy, he would not win, since the majority of people in this country want big government. I have come to believe that our only hope is to reform the GOP from within, getting libertarian policy (such as moving to a NST, or SS reform, or deregulating the FDA drug approval process) enacted through GOP legislators.

I think the differences between Bush and Kerry are small, but significant, and I support Bush this time, both politically and financially. I consider my support of the corporatist Bush a rear-guard action against Kerry's outright socialist domestic policy.


15 posted on 07/04/2004 9:40:12 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mike4Freedom; William Creel
I haven't decided yet, but will consider both Badnarik and Peroutka.

If Bush would get on national TV and admit that he made a mistake by signing the CFR bill, the medicare prescription drug plan, and the "Patriot Act", I might vote for him again after all.

In effect, he's already admitted he screwed up by federalizing the airport screeners.

19 posted on 07/04/2004 10:57:48 AM PDT by snopercod (The politicians make the weather then say "$hit, it's raining"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mike4Freedom

Again, you efforts to split the Conservative vote across a bunch of loser Third Parties is very transparent.


20 posted on 07/04/2004 10:59:34 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mike4Freedom

....also....one of the reasons we don't have "limited government" is that the non-Liberals (including Conservatives...) allowed the Left to almost totally dominate academia, the legal profession, the courts, big government/bureaucracy, labor, entertainment, etc. If Conservatives dominated big government (instead of running away from it a crying about it) and then practiced what they preach, then big government would shrink from within. Remaining on the outside (bitching and moaning) isn't working. Yes? No? Third Parties are third rate.


24 posted on 07/04/2004 11:03:35 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mike4Freedom
Every freedom lover should overlook the small differences and vote for the candidate with the best ballot access position, the Libertarian.

And I would do it in a heartbeat except for:

29 posted on 07/04/2004 12:24:26 PM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson