Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Limited government' is dead
World Net Daily ^ | July 3, 2004 | Kyle Williams

Posted on 07/04/2004 7:33:03 AM PDT by Mikey

It's popular to talk about limited government these days. Paying lip service to the idea of a smaller federal government is not revolutionary anymore. Everyone talks about it now, but no one follows his or her rhetoric with action. Everyone from Tom Daschle talking about fiscal responsibility to Constitution Party presidential nominee Michael Peroutka, talking about a government that could function in a moral way, is using the monster of a federal government as a means to submit his or her politically beneficial solution.

We've got to face reality and see that the term "limited government" has been worn out and no longer holds power, emphasis or really any meaning.

There are at least two reasons why this term is dead. First, those who stand for a perceived smaller government have committed adultery. I'm not talking about a random liberal who spouts off about fiscal responsibility. I'm talking about conservatives who make a commitment to smaller government and talks the talk about such things, but doesn't actually do anything. Ronald Reagan was one of the greatest orators and supporter in favor of limited government, but his administration didn't greatly decrease the size of the federal government. Another example is the Republican takeover of Congress during the Clinton administration followed by their failure to eliminate countless, wasteful federal departments.

The second reason the "limited government" term is dead goes hand-in-hand with the first. "Limited government" has yet to be defined. Thus, anyone can talk about fewer taxes, eliminating government waste and limiting government, but they can't be called on the carpet about their statements, because no one really knows what limited government is. Or maybe politicians don't want to admit the real definition of limited government in this nation.

Limited government is a constitutional government. This is plain and simple on the federal level, because the nitty-gritty services of government are done on the state and local level. The federal government was expected to be small and limited.

Still, we can talk about the Constitution all day long and it won't make a difference. Conservatives, if they want a shot at real limited government, need to quit talking.

Thus, conservatives need to stay united on at least on issue: limited government. But the biggest question is this: How do we return to a constitutional government? There are countless things wrong with our federal government, and they can't all be tackled at the same time – which, I believe, is one of the reasons our task of reform in America seems to be impossible.

We need to concentrate on taxes. The flow of money into the beast of the federal government allows for the funding of all the socialistic and immoral departments we gripe about.

Further, we need to do more than just cut taxes; we need to eliminate some taxes altogether. Cutting taxes is good, but all it does is eventually increase the budget when the economy is spurred.

The battleground for conservatives is in true fiscal responsibility. Unfortunately, neither presidential candidate will push this agenda.

Politicians can speak heavy rhetoric and activists can reiterate the need to decrease the size of our federal government and pay off the national debt, but the only way do to anything about it is cut off the flow of cash into the budget, thus requiring extensive elimination of federal departments and programs.

Yes, education reform is needed, we should leave the United Nations, foreign aid should be eliminated, Social Security and Medicare must be reformed, and various other issues must be resolved, but we're going nowhere if we're still funding the beast.

Limited government is about eliminating taxes. That should be the focus of conservatives.

________________________

Special Offer!

In Kyle Williams' book, "Seen and Heard," America's youngest national columnist takes on the establishment, offering clear evidence that a leftist agenda is at work in our nation. His lively, energetic analysis of current events is both informative and entertaining and will leave readers with a better understanding of the daily attacks against traditional family values. Order your copy now in ShopNetDaily.

Kyle Williams is 15 years old and lives in a rural community in America's heartland. In addition to his weekly weekend column on WorldNetDaily, Kyle also has a daily blog at OklahomaConservative.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; constitutional; kylewilliams; limitedgovernment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: cyborg
Alan Keyes:

And you didn't come to me first? I suppose my mastery of the English language and extensive diplomatic experience don't qualify me to answer a simple question involving my own exclusion from the Republican Party, presidential primary debates. Well, if that's the attitude you're going to take... Harrumph!

41 posted on 07/04/2004 10:35:20 PM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid (This message paid for by the committee to elect Alan Keyes to something...anything really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DMZFrank
If it was (again) a Constitutional government, it would automatically be a small and frugal government.
42 posted on 07/06/2004 7:49:51 PM PDT by Mikey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tm22721
"Why get your panties in a bunch over something you can't control ?"

First off I don't know about YOU, but I don't wear panties.
Second, what's your problem.?

I (by Myself) may not be able to "control" it, but with the help of a few million patriotic Americans willing to fight the fight against tyranny, we all might be able to destroy tyranny or at least stop it for now.

To throw up my hands and say oh well sounds more like the youth of today.

43 posted on 07/06/2004 7:58:15 PM PDT by Mikey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson