Posted on 07/03/2004 7:32:11 AM PDT by kristinn
SAN FRANCISCO - In a June 28 story about former President Clinton and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, The Associated Press erroneously reported a quote by Sen. Clinton. The passage should have included her phrase "and be fiscally responsible."
The full quote was: "We're not coming to you, many of whom are well enough off that actually the tax cuts may have helped you, and say 'we're going to give you more.' We're saying, 'you know what, for America to get back on track and be fiscally responsible, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.'"
Communism is communism is communism is communism.....
Adding the vague weasel-words "fiscally responsible" does not change Hillary Clinton's meaning one iota.
>>silimarity of today's market to the October 1987 market.
I believe that the market is going to be manipulated this Summer and Fall by the likes of Soros/Buffet in order to throw the election to Kerry.
How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan -Remarks in Arlington, Virginia, September 25, 1987
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.'"
"I believe that the market is going to be manipulated this Summer and Fall by the likes of Soros/Buffet in order to throw the election to Kerry."
While everyone was laughing about Hillry's shrill in CT, about a Bush economy was one and same as "Hoover economy", I took it as a WARNING to her good buddies to prepare.
The women has not left the "economy" topic for very long and Soros himself if he could, in a heartbeat would pull a stunt to create a "hoover economy".
I also recall Hillry and an October surprise being written about, not that it was specific to the "economy".
I have tucked all these little clues and today when there was this person on claiming the similarities to October 1987 and Hillry's latest rant, did not seem to be a coincidence.
Whether they can pull it off is beyond my abilities, however, it fits the pattern of "whatever it takes" to regain power.
Just for the record: First of all, democrats and Bush haters will vote for Kerry no matter who he chooses as his running mate.
The Clintons don't want Edwards on the ticket, so he won't be there.
Gebhardt dropped out early and gracefully, caused the Kerry campaign no grief, they get along, and Kerry can sell Gebhardt as most qualified to be president should something happen to him.
The reason Kerry is announcing this on the internet is to muffle the criticism, and soften the disappointment of all the Edwards supporters with some cutesy pie .com theatrics.
And about Hillary's socialistic coming out comment? She's just re-establishing her ties to the far left wing of the party.
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.'"
How is adding, that the government will use the money they take away from you "for the common good" "responsibly", change the fact that they DO want to take it away from you, for the "common good".
If a mugger stops you on the street and demands you give him all your money, but also assures you, that he will be "fiscally responsible" with it, will that make you feel any better, will that make his acts any less illegal?
Oh for Pete's sake...BTTT
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.