Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sanchez makes naval history(F-14 Tomcats being phased out)
The Bee-Picayune ^ | July 2, 2004

Posted on 07/02/2004 5:27:53 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: Pukin Dog
I know, I've seen the old photos of the SUNDOWNER's paint scheme, and most of the others of the era.

I'm not convinced that the modest decrease in observability was worth the sacrifice in unit morale that the descision caused.

We're going back to a "glossy" paint scheme on the ORION, along with full-color tailfeathers on the skipper's birds. It looks great and gives everyone a point of pride.

Colorful birds didn't seem to hurt Richthofen, or Chennault's boys. And nose art sure didn't hurt the 8th Air Force. Such displays are a sign of morale and pride in ownership, as well as enthusiasm.

I always thought that bans on such things were driven by blackshoes with an envy complex.

61 posted on 07/03/2004 4:33:49 PM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
I do not know about F-15, but sometime you need the AC to cool all the electronics or they will overheat. You are right about one thing fighter pilots (pilots in general) can be wimps about certain stuff sometimes. All joking aside we are all in this together.
62 posted on 07/03/2004 4:36:15 PM PDT by Veloxherc (To go up pull back, to go down pull back all the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

My personal favorite was VF-84's "skull and bones" logo.


63 posted on 07/03/2004 4:37:05 PM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
My personal favorite was VF-84's "skull and bones" logo.

Jolly Rogers?

Those guys are pussies.

64 posted on 07/03/2004 5:21:31 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

You're biased!


65 posted on 07/03/2004 5:22:13 PM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Veloxherc
We never believed those Eagle guys. We figured they found out they were going to be taking on the Pukin Dogs and flipped some switches so they could bow out.
66 posted on 07/03/2004 5:23:48 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
No, those guys are flying Super Hornets now, wishing they still had their Cats. They wont say so publicly, but corner one in the O-club, and they will give you an earful.
67 posted on 07/03/2004 5:25:39 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
I'm not convinced that the modest decrease in observability was worth the sacrifice in unit morale that the descision caused.

I agree, it was stupid.

Whats the point of having a kick-ass CAG bird if it looks like a bucket of spit?

68 posted on 07/03/2004 5:27:17 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

I thought all the tooling was scrapped. Wasn't Cheney behind that decision?


69 posted on 07/03/2004 5:27:29 PM PDT by Fred Hayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

If that's the case, I pity them. However, they'll probably claim that it's all that and a bag of chips. They have to now.


70 posted on 07/03/2004 5:28:15 PM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut

I thought they were all gonna be carrier capable regardless of service assigned ?

Stay safe !


71 posted on 07/03/2004 5:28:16 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek
Cheney had a bad day. The Tomcat is super expensive and the Hornet was killing us on readiness ratios. We could not compete with their modular packages, when duct tape was our best tool.
72 posted on 07/03/2004 5:29:09 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
NEGATIVE, Ghostrider!

It wouldn't cost the taxpayer nearly as much if they did that.

73 posted on 07/03/2004 5:29:40 PM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Can't speak to the original F-111s...but in their old age they had a M1.2 speed limit on the TFR because the TFR didn't see far enough ahead to do calculations for higher speed.

That said, in VFR, I hit M1.6 on the deck in an F-model...it was still accelerating nicely, but we were out of supersonic airspace.

I'm hard pressed to believe either the B-1 or F-14 would be easily accelerating at M1.6 & 500 feet.


74 posted on 07/03/2004 5:31:22 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
I told a Super Hornet driver last week that TopGun was going to start teaching tactical-tanking. He almost believed me until I started talking about how they were going to have to do a successful tank inverted. I've got a great dead-pan.
75 posted on 07/03/2004 5:31:26 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Sea level B-1B = 920 knots.
Sea level Tomcat = 900 knots.
76 posted on 07/03/2004 5:33:03 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Gawd. That thing sounds like a real fiasco. Wonder how long it'll take the press to find out. Scandal, here we come.


77 posted on 07/03/2004 5:38:36 PM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Being honest don't get you promoted by LBJ, thats for sure....


78 posted on 07/03/2004 5:42:42 PM PDT by ASOC (You only have the freedoms you are willing to fight for today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut

http://www.jsf.mil/IEFrames.htm

OK I'm learning...... we're talking JSF 35 right ??

Stay safe LC !


79 posted on 07/03/2004 5:47:07 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Don't have the formula on hand, but roughly speaking...M1.6 x 600 kts = 960...and we were still accelerating with ease. But the ground was probably around 4000', not sea level...

Pity we can't go out over the ocean with an F-14 & F-111F and find out what they would really do! Any other model of the F-111 would lose, but the F-model had some real get up and go. And soon, the Tomcat will join the F-111F as history (Aussies still fly the 111, but not the F).

I'm getting old, Pukin Dog. I can remember seeing 150 F-4s on the ramp at George AFB alone. That's more firepower than any european country save Britian can muster - and it was just one base.


80 posted on 07/03/2004 5:55:15 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson