To: sawmill trash
I just figure that with all the fossils that are scattered all over the world there would be some evidence of evolution if it were true, yet all that is ever found is species of one type or another. Any fossil find will sooner or later be assigned to a species. That this happens does not change that many fossils form seemingly obvious (except to creationists) transitional sequences. Creationism builds its "science" upon not seeing, upon ignoring away the obvious. That's not really very useful.
116 posted on
07/04/2004 8:44:19 AM PDT by
VadeRetro
(You don't just bat those big liquid eyes and I start noticing how lovely you are. Hah!)
To: VadeRetro
Creationism builds its "science" upon not seeing, upon ignoring away the obvious. The OJ jury saw no evidence of Simson's guilt. Sure, there was some of his blood at the crime scene, and some of the victims' blood on his clothes at his house, but that's not evidence of anything. It's just blood!
117 posted on
07/04/2004 8:52:31 AM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson