GOP Wages War Against Its Conservatives

Colorado Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo is in big trouble with the GOP leadership. And just what, you may be wondering, is his great sin? "Team America," a political action committee originally founded by Tancredo, worked to unseat Representative Chris Cannon, a liberal Republican from Utah, by supporting Matthew Throckmorton, his challenger in the Republican primary.

Chief among those organizations caterwauling about the actions of Tancredo is the liberal "Tuesday Group," a coalition of approximately thirty liberal Republican House members whose goal is to steer the party to the left. Hiding under the cloak of a grossly distorted rendition of Ronald Reagan's "Eleventh Commandment" ("Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican"), the Tuesday Group is now expressing concern that party conservatives are finally making efforts to strike back.

Apparently, undermining the conservative agenda by abandoning the party at key junctures during the legislative process is perfectly fine with these Republican "centrists." But any discussion of such matters by conservatives, who have tired of seeing their party abandoning its principles, is strictly taboo. By such hypocritical assertions, these liberal "Trojan Horses" hope to continue dominating party politics from within.

Of course Ronald Reagan never intended for his "Eleventh Commandment" to be arbitrarily invoked as a means of allowing liberalism to spread, unchecked, within the ranks of the GOP. Rather, it was supposed to prevent the sort of backbiting and mud slinging within party ranks, which can ultimately undermine the credibility of the entire party.

House Majority leader Tom Delay, a longtime champion of conservatism, has found himself in the middle of this row. Seeking to maintain a cohesive Republican majority, he is promoting themes of "team spirit" and "comity" among party members. Delay even referenced Reagan's "Eleventh Commandment" in a meeting with Tancredo in which the Colorado Congressman was apparently warned to change his ways and endorse a unified party, or face retribution within Republican circles.

Unfortunately, such rhetoric fails to deal with the fact that it is the Republican liberals who regularly undermine party unity by voting with Democrats at critical junctures. With such people constantly placing the philosophies of liberalism ahead of traditional Republican principle, the only manner in which even a facade of "unity" can be maintained is for the entire party to shift to the left. This, of course, is precisely the strategy of the liberal Republicans.

Tancredo's major issue of concern is unchecked illegal immigration and the resulting compromise of America's borders. Hardly a miniscule "pet issue" of a fringe constituency, the immigration problem goes to the very core of maintaining America's national integrity and heritage. Little else of GOP principles or goals can be regarded as significant in any way, as long the party remains indifferent to the invasion of the nation's borders by a flood of illegal immigrants who, as soon as they are able to do so, will vote against such things. Yet, major forces within the GOP are once again actively working to insure that at best, the Republican counterpart to Democrat plans of opening the borders will only amount to a watered-down version of the very same thing.

By supporting truly conservative Republican challengers, Tancredo's PAC hopes to specifically target key players of the open borders advocacy for defeat during their respective state primaries. While it is not entirely clear whether or not Tancredo is still officially participating with the work of the PAC, his political ideology remains consistent with that of its members. Tancredo realizes that threats to the future of the nation are no less virulent when advanced by so-called "Republicans," than when spawned by their traditional advocates, the Democrats.

Tom Delay has, in the past, shown himself to be extremely principled, with the one notable exception being his support, under severe White House pressure, for an education bill that was essentially crafted by Ted Kennedy. He knows that if his party persists in its claims to uphold both high and low standards, only the low standards will prevail. Though presently striving to remain within the boundaries of party loyalty, he is surely aware that, as a principled conservative, his own future is no less threatened by the underhanded actions of the "moderates" than is Tancredo.

For Delay and Tancredo, whose differences are far outweighed by their political common ground, the most pressing matter is to maintain the party according to conservative principle rather than allowing the "centrists" to reinvent it in the image of the Democrats.

Tancredo working with the Buchanans and their cabal is not exactly something I can support.

Tancredo is my congressman. I know him. He's a rock solid republican conservative and, unlike Buchanan, a strong supporter of America's WOT and Israel's right to exist and defend itself. He refuses to bring home bacon to his district because it is pork. He is someone you ought to want in congress as well as a bunch more like him.

He disagrees with the administration on Immigration. That doesn't make him a nut like Buchanan, even though he agrees with Buchanan on this issue. Buchanan, like a broken clock, is right occasionally. Tancredo is solid conservative all of the time.

The heart and soul of the party will be set in primaries. I think it's perfectly OK to support conservatives in primaries even if it pisses President Bush off. I mean, I support Bush and will work hard for his reelection, but he isn't exactly the dream date for a conservative.

It's way past high time some people got theor facts straight about the Republican Party and what it stands for.

1. Bush completely supports racial preferences. It was the White House counsel, an AA appointee named Alberto Gonzales, who ordered the Justice Dept. to narrow theor argument in the Grutter case so that O'Connor could enshrine racial preferences in the constitution. O'Connor was one of Reagan's greatest mistakes. She is an intellectual midget who was nothing more than a party apparatchik in the AZ Republican Party. Being a female to boot, it was a great two-fer: Payoff for the support of the AZ Party, and a sop to the feminists who were busy agitating for a female justice. To top it off, when asked about the Grutter decision, which is the moral equivalent of the Dred Scott decision since white Americans are enshrined as being 'less equal' than others, President Bush's only responese was to parrot a Marxist slogan: "Diversity is our strength!"

2. GW Bush is indeed only marginally better than Kerry on defense. He has continued Clinton's policies of a) allowing women in poistions very cole to combat; b) the "don't ask - don't tell facade for allowing gay infiltration of the military; c) refused to expand the numbers (as mentioned); d) continued Clinton's racial preference scheme, which replaced the previous truly color-blind system that had worked admirably since the Truman adminstration; e) selling off our military technology to the Chinese - smart bombs are now made in China.

3. Second Amendment. GW Bush has expicitly stated that he will sign a renewed Assaut Weapons ban. There has been a steady erosion of the second amendment. Judges have made ourtrageously unconstitutional decisions regarding this issue and Republicans - the plaid-pants Country Club types who own and operate the party - could care less.

4. Abortion. It's fascinating to see how many pro-lifers fell for the sham partial-birth abortion law and pledged their loyalty to Dubya. The Imperial Supreme Court has already decided that partial birth abortion is part of the constitution, even if equal protection of the law isn't (some of us being more equal than others). The law was a sop to pro-lifers to buy their votes - nothing more. It's already been struck down by a Marxist judge, and will certainly be decalred unconstitutional by a host of others. The one thing GWB could have done to truly influence the courts was to support Pat Toomey's challenge to the abominable leftist RINO pro-abortionist Areln Specter, who will be in charge of the Senate Judiciary Committee should the Republicans maintain control of the Senate. Specter will make sure that no pro-life judge is seated. Bush campaigned for Specter against the unabashedly pro-life Toomey. There's no excuse. As with defense, Bush is at best only marginally better than Kerry. At least Kerry is honest about hos support of abortion.

Oh, and lest we forget: GWB had nothing but effusive praise for Bill Clinton, a President who actually betrayed the country to a hostile foreign power by selling sensitive military technology which has enabled them to delpoy missiles capable of vaporizing American cities. Not only has Dubya left numerous of the Clinton un-dead walking the halls of Federal agencies (Norman Mineta being as shining example), he refuses to prosecute the numerous crimes of the criminal Clinton gang. Even worse, the Bush Justice Dept. has been spending our tac dollars to defend the criminal activities of the Clintons against lawsuits. Again, there's no excuse.

The Republican Party is owned and operated by Corporatist apparatchiks who care nothing about the issues that religious people and other social conservatives care about. There have been 120 documented incidents of the Mexican Army crossing the border in the last decade. As someone mentioned, the open-borders Jihadis at the Wall Street Journal flatly advocate the abolition of the United States as an independent political entity by diisoving its borders. Illegal aliens are now allowed to vote (suppoesedly only in local elections - hahaha), sit in juries, receive in-state tuition, welfare (free medical care, housing, food stamps), obtain driver's licenses, open bank accounts, etc., etc. As others have mentioned, Bush's amnesty plan to legalize ethe lawless basically would allow any foreign national to underbid an American worker for their job. To top it all off, the Imperial Supreme Court declared this week that enemby combatants - foreign nationals captured in persuing armed action gainst the United States - are entitled to the constitutional protections that normally would only apply to citizens, Any expression of outrage over such a lawless re-write of the Constitution? Does that oath the President and others take really mean anything? I guess it's just a formaility now - nothing more.

Kerry and Bush are not substantively different on any issue of importance to bona-fide conservatives. It's a sad state of affairs. Bush has the edge only insofar that he is less honest about his liberalism than Kerry.

You have the Brady Bill confused with the "assault weapon" ban.

On November 24, 1993, Dole assured conservatives that they could go home for Thanksgiving and that he would stay to oversee the mundane duties of adjourning for the holiday. When the conservatives were gone, he, Mitchel and one other scumbag liberal passed the Brady Bill.

Here's what Sen. Dole had to say about his actions:

I know the Gun Owners of America, another group, have a little different view. They are blaming me for the Brady bill that passed because I sat there with the majority leader and everybody else had gone home, and we made an arrangement. We let that bill pass. I was picketed, and they called me a traitor, and everything else . . . because that happened. (Source: Congressional Record, August 23, 1994, p. S 12363.)

On November 19, 1993, Bob Dole voted for the Feinstein "assault weapon" ban on more than 180 semi-auto firearms. Moreover, less than two weeks earlier Dole had brokered an agreement which prevented a filibuster on the Feinstein amendment from ever taking place. (Source: Congressional Record, November 10, 1993, p. S15584-5.)

In January, 1994, Bob Dole urged the President -- on nationwide T.V. -- to support the Senate version of the crime bill that contained the Feinstein gun ban. (Source: Dole's rebuttal to Clinton's State of the Union Address, reprinted in the The Washington Post, 1/26/94.)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.