Replies

There’s an anti-violence project study for 2002 here.
http://www.avp.org/publications/reports/2002NCAVPdvrpt.pdf

A family research report for 2001 here.
http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRR_01_12.html

Gay on gay violence.
http://www.web.apc.org/~jharnick/violence.html

The 500% figure is from an American Family Association of Michigan 2001 report
http://www.afamichigan.org/releases/20010315a.htm

To be ‘fair and balanced’ this figure is disputed.
http://www.afaexposed.com/a_letellier.html

I believe the figure to be correct though and it is probably even higher since the homosexual community consistently trots out Kinsey’s figure of a 10% homosexual population in America as fact.

Considering an anonymous poll of 89000 people conducted by StatsCan gives a figure of 1% for homosexuals in Canada and that Canada itself is hardly unfriendly to homosexuals, we can safely deduce the figure is probably quite close to what we would find in America and nowhere near the 10% that Kinsey alleged.

Just 1% of Canadians say they're homosexual
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040616/GAY16/TPNational/Canada

The numbers game: What percentage of the population is gay?
http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_AIM_Talk.html

I’ve not gone into refuting Kinsey’s methods and findings too much here since that has already been done by people far better on these matters than myself.

Regards,
Flashy

Thanks for posting the article. The statistics on condoms were a surprise and a show-stopper. I thought they were a lot more effective against STD's -- although I knew about their ineffectiveness against herpes. I had thought them more effective against HIV, except for the ineffectual Lambskin types.