Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Behind Liberal Lines
I doubt that the "US" was 1st world in 1910. 1909 saw the SF Earthquake (and before that the port town of Galveston Texas wiped out in a flood).

We did have an "industrial" revolution but I doubt that it was widespread across the regions.

Consider too that eastern Europe had civilization 1,000 years old.

America was barely 300 years "settled" (and much less for the western regions).

23 posted on 06/29/2004 1:09:08 AM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: weegee

Disagree. By this past century we were on top as far as development was concerned. (I'm not counting world-POWER status.) We were far advanced compared to almost all - by that period we owned most of the great inventions and monopolized on innovation. It was just our unlimited system that put it to that point.

The industrial rev in the US was already some 70 years old. The railroads were 2nd to none - on a HUGE country. That's plenty of time before 1900 to have great influence.

BTW, the SF earthquake was 1906. Not that I understand what natural disasters have to do w/status!


27 posted on 06/29/2004 5:48:16 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (I was there! I passed Reagan's casket 6/10 3:40 PM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson