To: ambrose
What a gutless wonder.
A proposal that wouldn't have harmed 1 single animal more than the previous law did, and would have saved millions for local governments that chose to goto 3 days, gets pulled off the table because of pressure from the kook-wing.
To: Josh in PA
Just say no to puppy killing.
9 posted on
06/25/2004 5:31:01 PM PDT by
ambrose
("Wearing Religion on Your Sleeve," DemoRat Style: http://tinyurl.com/yvvmz)
To: Josh in PA
Arrrggg! Niether the old nor the new law requires any animal to be killed. These laws mandate that certain animals may not be killed for a certain number of days. Shelters can still put their dogs in a palace for life if that's how they want to spend their money.
To: Josh in PA
Howie Carr has a vet on occasionally. Today was one of those days. The vet said the 6 days was a good idea for rabies, or other diseases.
I think I'd trust governments to quarantine suspected dogs on their own if a rescue squad helps a dog bite victim.
To: Josh in PA
78 posted on
06/25/2004 7:52:32 PM PDT by
ZULU
To: Josh in PA
A proposal that wouldn't have harmed 1 single animal more than the previous law did, and would have saved millions for local governments that chose to goto 3 days, gets pulled off the table because of pressure from the kook-wing. He could have saved more by proposing to cut the illegal aliens off of the Cali welfare tit, but I guess he's too afraid to do something real.
87 posted on
06/27/2004 8:45:12 PM PDT by
Bella_Bru
(It's for the children = It takes a village)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson