[evad]

Did you retract a statement of yours somewhere along the line, and I missed it?

Not at all.

The debate that I'm talking about (and the title of the thread) is the question of homosexuality being behavioral or genetic. I find convincing arguments on both sides of that argument although I tend to lean in the 'genetic' direction as to cause.

But, maybe I'm the one that misunderstood. What did you mean by the pro-homosexuality side?

>>What specific points on the pro-homosexuality side do you find overwhelming? <<

[William Terrell]

I find convincing arguments on both sides of that argument although I tend to lean in the 'genetic' direction as to cause.

But, maybe I'm the one that misunderstood. What did you mean by the pro-homosexuality side?

Ok. I'll try to be more clear. The are two sides to the argument, as you say. That means that there is a side that is against the notion that homosexuality is genetically determined. It is anti-homosexual because that side refutes the basis for which homosexuals claim special consideration.

With me so far?

The side that supports that notion, on which the homosexuals claim equal tolerance for lifestyle, anti-"hate" legislation, marriage rights, adoption rights, et cetera, is necessarily pro-homosexual.

Now, which pro-homosexual specific argument do you see as overwhelming evidence for the genetic cause of homosexuality?