Your very defensive, lfc. You're now lashing out at anyone who disagrees with you and labelling us all as "homosexual apologists."
I think this entire thread is ridiculous. It gives the Christian right a bad name, to have bible-thumping prigs like you finding fault with a popular kids' movie, and Pinocchio.
Are you one of those who scours Disney movies for anything that might look like a penis?
You're a very strange person. Do you know how few cross-dressers and transgenders there are? You act as if there's a rampant problem with men dressing up in women's clothes.
Maybe you hang with a different crowd than I do.
"and labelling us all as "homosexual apologists"
Where have I said that you all are homosexual apologists?
Have I called everyone here a homosexual apologist? No.
Where do you learn to think?
"you're very defensuive".
No, all I am doing is returning the cute remarks made to me, oh biased one, since you have nothing to say to them who started the personal attacks.
I didn't start the cute remarks, so you are talking to the wrong person.
When you go talk to the ones who started the cute remarks, then come back.
"I think this entire thread is ridiculous"
Then why are you still here? That doesn't make any sense. You being still here after feeling that way only proves that you are at least as ridiculous as that which you call ridiculous. Since you think this thread as being ridiculous, I shouldn't expect to see anymore comments from you on it....that is if you don't want to give the impression that you are dumb enough to hang around a thread after calling it ridiculous.
"Are you one of those who scours Disney movies for anything that might look like a penis"
Whoa...you said it I didn't. I wonder why that thought was on your mind? Then again the reason is obvious.
"you're a very strange person"
Because I adress the subtle hints of crossdressing within the movie Shrek2? As well, if crossdressing literature wasn't going into schools, then this obviously wouldn't be a problem to be addressed, at least not right now. As well, the APA held a symposium on crossdressing and other disorders in 2003, and crossdressing wasn't taken off the list of mental disorders.
You need to be calling crossdressers strange. Yet you haven't. That speaks volumes.
I could care less how many crossdressers there are. If there are 50, or 5 million that still doesn't change the fact that crossdressing themes don't belong in childrens movies, in any way, shape form, or fashion. But obviously you don't feel that way, and that also speaks volumes.
"Maybe you hang ewith a different crowd than I do"
Yes, you not condemning crossdressing/transgenderism speaks volumes, like I said, and tells alot about who you most likely hang out with.
For the record, I would like to state that the lot of you are clearly homosexual apologists. And at least one of you is wearing men's panties right now.