I think saying "This is idiotic" pretty well sums up my feelings about it.
And I said I don't believe the part about the ADMINSTRATION OF DRUGS TO THE GENERAL POPULATION.
Sorry we didn't respond as you feel necessary, but it did give you a chance once again to put on your Holier Than Thou shrowd, didn't it?
And it's just a suggestion, but you better be a little more skeptical of Newsmax and WorldNet Daily; as we are able to post fewer and fewer actual news articles (and as even those we excerpt "disappear" within a few weeks/or months), we are relying more and more on "rearrangments" from those two entities.
In the past, neither one of them has proven to be the most reliable sites on the internet. Now it might not bother you that they copy articles almost word for word without crediting the source, as it probably suits your agenda; (and as an added bonus, you get to come on these threads and poke us with a stick because WE question the source), but some of us prefer to know what we're dealing with.
It looks like this is an inhouse WorldNet Daily article, when, in fact, it's not; you may "consider" the dynamic of our replies, while we consider the "dynamic" of you not being bothered by a plagiarised article.
As has been pointed out numerous times, the WND article is little more than a rehash of other legitimate sources. Sabertooth was even so kind as to post the Bush speech delivered when the committee was formed. Why are you ignoring these other sources and only attacking WND?