After only a few minutes of wading through the PDFs I referenced above (primarily the second one, which was NOT ref'd in the WND article, but IS ref'd in the PDF they DO mention), I must say that I do not think they're being sensationalist at all.
In other words their article seems to me to be right on the money.
This is unbeliveably bad stuff, for everyone but the most incurably statist idealists.
Hmm.. I'd have to agree "routine and comprehensive" screening certainly does seem to indicate that you're right. What's gonna happen if this gets implemented is there's gonna be a lot of unnecessary medicating. I would bet on it..