Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: monday
They both say essentially the same thing. WND's version is just slightly more compact. You are the one trying to spin this by discrediting WND.

Well, let's see:

WorldNet Daily's article went up on:

Posted: June 21, 2004 5:00 p.m. Eastern

And the bmj.com article went up on:

BMJ 2004;328:1458 (19 June)

written and credited to Jeanne Lenzer in New York.

Nowhere do I see where WorldNet Daily has given ANY credit to the author or the publication.

And you yourself say they both say the same thing, only WND is "slightly more compact," meaning, of course, they didn't copy ALL OF IT!

I'm not trying to discredit WND. I AM discrediting them with their own web site.

139 posted on 06/21/2004 11:41:59 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
I'm not trying to discredit WND. I AM discrediting them with their own web site.

Oh, please.

You're trying to discredit the article, by reframing the discussion.

233 posted on 06/22/2004 3:52:46 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson