To: counterpunch
Now you're just embarrassing yourself.
BTW, I consider myself to have a libertarian streak. Yet for the life of me I cannot understand how a libertarian could be pro-choice. It's obvious that a fetus carries the same individual rights as any other human, and therefore it's government's responsibility to extend protection to the fetus as it would any other life.
To: NittanyLion
Don't know if you've seen this fox Dynamic Poll. Check it out.
FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll. April 21-22, 2004. N=900 registered voters nationwide. MoE ± 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
"On the issue of abortion, would you say you are more pro-life or more pro-choice?" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
Pro-choice |
Pro-life |
Both/Mix (vol.) |
Not Sure |
|
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
4/04 |
44 |
47 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
7/03 |
44 |
44 |
6 |
6 |
|
|
4/03 |
49 |
41 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
1/02 |
47 |
41 |
5 |
7 |
|
|
1/01 |
47 |
42 |
7 |
4 |
|
|
7/00 |
54 |
38 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
1/00 |
43 |
44 |
8 |
5 |
|
|
6/99 |
42 |
44 |
9 |
5 |
|
|
316 posted on
06/20/2004 6:10:22 PM PDT by
Reagan Man
(.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
To: NittanyLion
Yet for the life of me I cannot understand how a libertarian could be pro-choice.
When did I ever say that I was pro-choice?
I never did, I only advanced the notion that Republicans are not monolithic on the abortion issue.
I don't have a strong opinion on the issue itself either way, aside from believing that Roe v. Wade should be overturned. Not on any moral grounds - since moral judgements are not within the court's jurisdiction - but rather on the grounds that it is just plain bad law.
I'm a strict constructionist, and I hate to see the Constitution perverted for anyone's personal agenda, and I hate to see judges acting as unelected legislators.
I try to keep my personal views and my political views seperate. I try to keep in mind the role of the courts - to judicate on the merits of the case, as prescribed by written law - rather than to do what liberals do and think the courts are there to force my personal views on society. That is something a lot of so-called conservatives could learn restraint in as well.
So what would I personally do about abortion?
Vote on it. That's what I always say. Let the people decide the legality of abortion. I can live with either decision. It's just not a huge issue on my personal radar.
That is what Arnold would do if he could. That's what I like about him. He says "let the people decide, and I will respect their will." That's what you Arnold-bashers don't seem to grasp about him. He's not a "liberal". He doesn't govern by an agenda - he governs by the will of the people. That's all anyone should ever ask for from a politician.
321 posted on
06/20/2004 6:34:16 PM PDT by
counterpunch
(The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.freepgs.com/counterpunch)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson