Posted on 06/17/2004 4:45:31 PM PDT by SJackson
US President Bush has, once again, suspended the relocation of the American embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Israel's capital, Jerusalem.
Bush did this by asserting that US national security will be harmed if he implements the US law requiring the move. Bush’s refusal to take concrete measures recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital has caused some to question the US President’s reputation as a ‘friend of Israel’.
Congress overwhelmingly approved the Jerusalem Embassy Relocation Act in 1995, mandating that the US Embassy be moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem by May 1999 and that the US recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital.
During the 2000 election campaign Bush pledged that if he was elected, he would "begin the process" of moving the embassy to Jerusalem on his "first day in office." After nearly four years, there is no evidence that he has begun that process.
In a memorandum to the Secretary of State on Tuesday, Bush wrote that he has determined it is necessity to suspend the transfer of the embassy for six months in order "to protect the national security interests" of the US. "My Administration remains committed to beginning the process of moving our embassy to Jerusalem," his memorandum said.
Former US President Bill Clinton, who promised in both of his presidential campaigns to move the embassy, shied away from implementation, signing successive six-month security waivers.
After the failed Camp David talks in July 2000 - Clinton suggested in an interview with Israeli television that he was considering moving the US embassy to Jerusalem.
In reaction, Hezbullah terror chief, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah threatened that if the US moved its embassy, the Arabs would "turn your embassy into rubble and return your diplomats in coffins."
The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) has sharply criticized the continued failure to implement the Embassy Relocation Act, demanding to know how the recognition of Israel’s capital would harm US national security.
"The failure to recognize Jerusalem is a violation of US law and a blatant surrender to Arab terrorist threats,” ZOA National President Morton A. Klein said. “At a time when America is engaged in a life-or-death struggle with terrorists worldwide, it is especially important to implement US law on Jerusalem and thereby send a message to terrorists everywhere that America will not capitulate to their blackmail. It is President Bush's refusal to move the embassy which could undermine national security because it encourages terrorists to believe that threats and violence will force the US to change its policies."
In 1980 Israel passed a basic law claiming Jerusalem as the Jewish State’s "eternal, indivisible capital," but only two countries, Costa Rica and El Salvador, maintain their embassies in Jerusalem.
?????????????
I haven't sent you anything.
Sorry, I meant the long posts, not Freepmail. I'm not gonna change your mind. You're not gonna change mind.
That's all. No foul intended.
At the very least this move will never be implemented because of fears of the reaction of our Arab "allies." At the worst, it may be tied in with Messiahphobia (the "Jewish world rule" schtick) and the State Department's alleged labelling of Israel as a "non-traditional adversary."
At any rate, such a move would be merely symbolic. If today's secular Israeli government refuses to recognize Jerusalem's unique status as the site of the Temple and the Sanhedrion, what does it matter if anyone else recognizes it as Israel's capital?
I'd love to see us recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital, but that isn't as important as implementing the Torah and building the Temple. Let's get on with it!
You’re absolutely right, it’s not a security issue. Better not to make promises you’re not going to keep.
….At the very least this move will never be implemented because of fears of the reaction of our Arab "allies." At the worst, it may be tied in with Messiahphobia (the "Jewish world rule" schtick) and the State Department's alleged labelling of Israel as a "non-traditional adversary."
I remember that. Contractors, watch out for your Jewish employees! I think it was the Defense Dept. rather than State.
Yeah, it was the DIS. It was retracted immediately, with a spokesman calling it "unfortunate and unauthorized". One may hope that the author got fired. The thing is still floating around, though - on antisemite sites such as amnotes.net. I've also found it on a sleazy wannabe "security" site.
dreadful little pisant,
happygrl~
Your membership card is on the way :>)
Amnotes, nasty place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.