Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beelzepug; Paleo Conservative
I don't know...the Brits have had pretty good success with the Nimrod.

With less sweepback on the wings, the Nimrod trades off maybe 25 kts transit speed for better low speed handling. (Which is more important?)

Plus 4 engines. Can patrol with 2 burning, one just rolling over, one shut dwown.

61 posted on 06/14/2004 9:16:34 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy ("Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one speaking the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Oztrich Boy; Long Cut

"With less sweepback on the wings..."

That's true enough. And the design is even older than the P3, going back, I believe, to the DH Comet. Interesting that the Comet was a flop as a commercial airliner, as was the Electra; one liked to disintegrate in midair and the other liked to vibrate its wings off. Yet, both have had great success in a military application. Still, I think the 737 variant will prove to be a good replacement over time.
I'll admit to being biased because the company I work for will probably get some work out of the Boeing deal


75 posted on 06/15/2004 8:54:33 AM PDT by beelzepug (I'll take "Why Me?" for a thousand, Alex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson