To: carton253
O.K.This is all too weird. The clintons really are sitting in the row in front of all the previous presidents. By themselves. Is there some kind of meaning to this?
To: small voice in the wilderness
Would you want to sit next to them?
776 posted on
06/11/2004 8:04:52 AM PDT by
carton253
(Re: The Reagan Presidency: Not bad. Not bad at all.)
To: small voice in the wilderness
Oh, poor Lynne Cheney. She drew the short straw and has to sit next to Bill.
Ooh, I hear French Horns.
791 posted on
06/11/2004 8:05:33 AM PDT by
Not A Snowbird
(You need tons click "co-ordinating")
To: small voice in the wilderness
802 posted on
06/11/2004 8:06:13 AM PDT by
Arrowhead1952
(It is not Bush's fault... it is the media's fault!)
To: small voice in the wilderness
I guess they are seated in order of presidency. That sucks though because Hillary is known to have hated Reagan.
809 posted on
06/11/2004 8:06:25 AM PDT by
dougherty
(I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free. - Michelangelo)
To: small voice in the wilderness
The clintons really are sitting in the row in front of all the previous presidents. By themselves. Is there some kind of meaning to this? Yes, notice the Presidents are sitting in order of term, Ford, Carter, Bush I, I would imagine the seats next to Clinton are for George and Laura.
824 posted on
06/11/2004 8:07:41 AM PDT by
commish
(Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
To: small voice in the wilderness
The clintons really are sitting in the row in front of all the previous presidents. By themselves. Is there some kind of meaning to this? The protocol is always to place the former Presidents in order starting with most recent one. Maybe Bush didn't want to sit next to him? Strange.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson