[Osage Orange]

You wrote:

"It's far too soon to give an objective answer on Clinton"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not for me...I don't need anymore "time" to give an answer. There are enough hard facts out there...to come to a very prudent, accurate, and yes, objective answer.

FWIW-

[r9etb]

The key word is "objective." We both feel that Clinton was an absolute disgrace to the office, and an utter failure. But if we want to look at Clinton's ultimate impact on the affairs and future of the nation (which is what these historians claim to be doing), we couldn't possibly do that yet, because there hasn't been enough time for his actions to fully shake out.

You'll note my reasons for why I think Clinton's "historian" numbers can only go down. You'll note, by contrast, that Eisenhower's numbers have been going up over the years, as more about his actions become known.