To: toddst
Agreed. One form of power that solves most problems (as pointed out in another post) is nuclear.I am not for that. Far too messy and a very dirty bomb sitting on our soil. Better ways to go about it than nuclear.
25 posted on
06/10/2004 7:53:07 AM PDT by
BJungNan
To: BJungNan
Better ways to go about it than nuclearNot really. Coal or nuc are the only practical options, but what do you think are the "better ways?"
27 posted on
06/10/2004 7:57:22 AM PDT by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: BJungNan
I am not for that. Far too messy and a very dirty bomb sitting on our soil. Better ways to go about it than nuclear. What is so messy about it? As far as it being a dirty bomb, practically the only way to breach containment short of a nuclear weapon would be a "bunker buster" bomb, and the terrorists are a little short on the military infrastructure to deliver one to the continental United States.
41 posted on
06/10/2004 10:07:08 AM PDT by
hopespringseternal
(People should be banned for sophistry.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson