"Not true. Our Constitution defines who is 'legally;' a human being, and afforded equal protection of the law. - It says [read the 14th] you must 'born' [defined as being capable of being born]. - Viable." Wow, now you can read the long since passed away minds of the founders to assert that 'born' means viable. Amazing, mister kreskin.
We can both agree that a woman carrying an embryo is a human being, correct? We disagree on when an embryo is constitutionally a human being, correct? Thus, in the Constitutional view, -- the woman has "equal protection'. -- You must prove that an embryo is a human being with equal rights to its mother.
Our Constitution defines who is 'legally;' a human being, and afforded equal protection of the law. - It says [read the 14th] you must 'born' [defined as being capable of being born]. - Viable. --- Embryos are not yet 'viable'.
Wow, now you can read the long since passed away minds of the founders to assert that 'born' means viable.
Nope, all I need to read is the plain english of our Constitution, and understand its principles.