The Democrats cannot compete if they depend solely on their traditional base of single welfare mothers, athiests, condom throwers, abortion enthusiasts, government-addicted minorities, gold-chained union thugs, screeching feminists, college professors, Hollywood drunks, America-hating malcontents, and all the rest of society's losers, parasites, and weirdos.
Democrats can only win if they can con enough normal, traditional, taxpaying Americans into (inexplicably) voting along with the Democrat base described above. Fortunately, the number of such people who are stupid enough to voluntarily tape "kick me" signs to their own backs has been steadily decreasing.
In 2000, the Democrats very nearly stole the Presidency. This year, however, will be an entirely different story because rather than a Justice Department (Clinton's) which will aid and abet Democrat vote fraud, we have a Justice Department (Bush's) which will BATTLE vote fraud. That's a whole lot of taxpayer funded lawyers. And the "swing" just might help produce a landslide.
great idea to suggest to any and all athiests and college professors that they are "society's losers, parasites and wierdos" who should go ahead and vote democrat
of course, those we count on to class up the bible-thumping rednecks around here will just know they've got their work cut out for them when they see you coming
They have another face to their constituency and the numbers are daunting. It means Kerry wins 25% of the vote before Bush gets out of bed on election day. It means that Bush must win 68% of the remaining sane folks if he is to reach 51%.
Blacks: 92% of 12% = 11.04 Hispanics: 75% of 12% = 9.00 Gays: 85% of 3% = 2.55 Jews: 80% of 3% = 2.40 TOTAL: 25%
This is why Kerry does not think he needs the south apart from Florida and New Mexico. This is why Bush cannot make a real dent in the Gore states.
Have to agree, also they aren't reproducing and endroctrinating duplicates of themselves.
Lancey are you aware that some non-supernaturalists are even more right wing and/or conservative than you?
Well, don't count on it.
Since the bottom half of society breeds at a faster rate, (even with their non-breeding segments) the quality of the average voter declines with each passing year.