Posted on 06/08/2004 10:21:58 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:42:15 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
What goes around comes around. Rall is a typical brat who can dish it out but can't take it. He needs to grow up.
Absolutely right, Mr. Rall. Your mandate as a journalist IS to report the truth, OBJECTIVELY and not colored by PERCEPTION or IDEOLOGY!!! Here, you have obviously crossed the line and allowed your ideology to influence your reporting of your perceived truth. Journalism should rely exclusively on facts, not inference.
They are journalist and it is thei job to Tell The Truth. They are liberals and they deny that there is any Truth and believe that reality is a mental construct. Therefore the Truth is what one of these deep thinkers perceives as being the most useful thing to say or write to promote his particular mental construct. They are not "lying" about things. They believe facts are what they want them to be.
Plenty of garden variety democrats in 1972 were, indeed, marxist-leninists. I understood that in 1972.
Maybe we should take some comfort in this. If Rall is classifying himself and the other Rats of the age as "garden-variety Democrat(s) circa 1972", we're in good shape politically speaking. In the election that year, those clowns lost 49 states in the biggest landslide in history. A pleasant thought that history might repeat itself...?
The American left has disintegrated and only can cling to people who lie as a part of their theatrics.
I CAN tell you that, at the rate he's going, he'll one day wake up to look over a lake of fire, find himself IN IT for eternity, and wonder forevermore what happened?
Yep, lies and hysteria are all the commie 'rats have left.
He's obviously not old enough to have been in 4th grade in 1972 and is the product of a pair of Marxist Hippie parents who raised their little twirp on Dr. Spock.
He's obviously spent a lot of time locked in a school bathroom stall hiding from boys intent on attitude adjustment, and a lot of time with his feet on courthouse steps in his adult life, threatening to sue the pants off anyone wanting to do it NOW.
I think I'd take him up on that offer, but I'd want to get in enough of a thumping to make it worth my while in court, and I'm only a very pissed off WOMAN! Let's see him deal with a REAL MAN!
We the people should be able to throw these MF'ers out of the country.
Rall is the Sacco & Vanzetti of the early 21st century.
"Equality" and "Justice" are meaningless words to these people who talk openly about anarchist revolutions and "stringing up" (IE LYNCHING) CEO's or anyone else who opposes them.
Of course he believes in the 2nd Amendment. Not because of what it was intended to do - support our Republic - but because he wants guns TO FIGHT AGAINST IT WITH!
What a POS.
Is he related to Michael Moore? What is it with fat guys and anti-Americanism lately?
I can understand why - Rall has all of Fisk's evil, but none of his talent. (Whatever else they may have in common, I can only speculate.)
They like to bite the hand that feeds (and feeds and feeds) them.
Doesn't the human body generate enough energy to power a lightbulb? If true, there could be a use for Ted Rall yet.
About 100 Watts on average. I suspect, though, that a bulb powered by Ted Rall would be dim indeed.
If true, there could be a use for Ted Rall yet.
If my car was stuck in the mud and I needed something to put under the wheels for traction, Ted Rall is just the guy I'd want to have around.
They actually think that going "farther left" will restore the voting power of the Democrats.
The words most often left out in describing Rall are:
Traitor and Seditious.
Actually, I think you could make Rall curl up into a ball with a hard look and that he relies on the basic human impulse of not beating the crap out of pathetic losers to survive from day to day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.