Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kjam22
And the Supreme Court has consitently ruled in thier favor.

I don't think the Supreme Court has ruled on this issue. I would think that if the issue came before the supreme court that they would state categorically that if a city has a religious heritage that it would be perfectly permissible for that city to reflect that heritage in their official seal as it would serve a secular purpose to recognize that heritage.

My guess is that if one of these cases made it to the supreme court that the SCOTUS would rule unanimously that a cross on the seal of a city founded by missionaries from the Catholic Church was constitutionally permissible.

25 posted on 06/07/2004 3:08:46 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Free the GRPL 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe
You're not correct on this one. Here's a link where the supreme court ruled on a suburb of Oklahoma City. Edmond.

http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=498

After this the ACLU went after another suburb called "Bethany". Bethany is a little town within Oklahoma City that was founded by the Nazarene church. Built around a Nazarene college. The symbol of the college, among other things was on the city seal. This had to be removed. The city lost in fed court but decided not to appeal to the Supreme Court because of the cost, and because of Edmond having just gotten kicked.

LA county will not win this in court. Until we take back our courts, we cannot live in freedom.

49 posted on 06/08/2004 6:09:18 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson