Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GraniteStateConservative

I think it will be Rudy. If not, I hope it's Porter Goss.

Rudy is by far my #1 choice.


339 posted on 06/03/2004 8:12:47 AM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]


To: redlipstick

Rudy makes more sense PR-wise, but Goss is more qualified.


345 posted on 06/03/2004 8:14:03 AM PDT by LI conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick

Rudy is too heavy handed to be effective, if you really don't want a dysfunctional CIA. Rudy would be best as our governor here in NYS -- he's better as an executive -- though I hope he knocks off Sen. Hillary first.


365 posted on 06/03/2004 8:16:53 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
I think it will be Rudy. If not, I hope it's Porter Goss.

It won't be Rudy. We're in a war that absolutely depends on accurate intelligence. W needs a guy who already knows how to run an intel organization. Porter Goss is a better choice, but again he's not an intel guy, but rather an intel recipient. My prediction is Gen. Ralph Eberhardt, currently commander of the Northern Command.

And, very conveniently, I see that Gen. Eberhardt retired last week.

382 posted on 06/03/2004 8:19:38 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson