Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RaceBannon
this aircraft would have been showing serious control problems from vibration during flight, and most likely vibrate to a point that scared the life out of the passengers and crew or create a noise that would be clearly noticeable in flight.

You mean, control problems such as several sharp, hard-over rudder movements?

110 posted on 06/03/2004 10:09:06 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb

"You mean, control problems such as several sharp, hard-over rudder movements?"

See my post just above yours.


114 posted on 06/03/2004 10:11:53 AM PDT by HighWheeler ("Would I turn on the gas if my pal Mugsy were in there?" "Ye might rabbit, ye might." Bugs, 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb

It would be in both directions, not just one, and once in the diretion of the crack-to-open, THAT would be a certain hard over rudder!

One to GROUND the airplane by any smart pilot!

That is one reason I dont believe it is fatigue, it would be too obvious, the tail FAILING to cause a hard rudder movement, and to SEE the damage there, that would be obvious to Ray Charles as an inspector!


116 posted on 06/03/2004 10:12:57 AM PDT by RaceBannon (VOTE DEMOCRAT AND LEARN ARABIC FREE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson